Student Area

info@aicehk.org

Student Area

Outstanding Creative Campus Design Award

This initiative aims to recognize schools that feature creative and distinctive campus designs, promote diverse learning spaces, enhance campus functionality through innovative design concepts, and demonstrate impactful contributions to STEAM education (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics).

Nomination Method:

Please submit the file in PowerPoint, MP4, or PDF format; the content must include:

  • Please provide photos of your school’s campus design or layout, along with relevant supporting documents and certificates, to demonstrate that the lesson plan or campus design has been recognized by other organizations and to enhance credibility; submission of videos and lesson plans is mandatory.
  • Your school/organization’s logo (PNG, PDF, or AI file).

Award recipients are required to submit:

  1. One recent half-body photo (JPG format, under 10MB) and
  2. An acceptance statement of at least 150 words (in PDF or Word format, with a total file size not exceeding 10MB).

Evaluation Criteria, Guidelines & Score Sheets:

When evaluating entries for the STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) Outstanding Creative Campus Design Award, the following criteria may be considered:

  • 1. Creativity and Innovation
    10%
    Evaluate the creativity and uniqueness of the campus STEAM design and layout, including the innovativeness of the design philosophy, concepts, and elements.
    - Design lacks innovation and resembles traditional models | 0–3 points
    - Contains creative elements, but the overall design remains ordinary | 4–7 points
    - Unique design concept demonstrating a high level of innovative thinking | 8–10 points
  • 2. Educational Value
    10%
    Consider the value of the campus design and layout for student learning and education, including whether it stimulates student interest and fosters learning in disciplines such as science, technology, arts, engineering, and mathematics (STEAM).
    - Limited impact on student learning; fails to spark interest | 0–3 points
    - Sparks some student interest; moderate impact on fostering learning in these disciplines | 4–7 points
    - Significantly boosts student interest; has a positive impact on learning in STEAM disciplines | 8–10 points
  • 3. Connection to STEAM themes
    10%
    Evaluate the alignment of the campus design and layout with STEAM themes, including the ability to showcase concepts and applications related to Science, Technology, Arts, Engineering, and Mathematics.
    - Connection to STEAM themes is unclear; relevant concepts are not demonstrated | 0–3 points
    - Some connection to STEAM themes exists, but it is not clearly evident | 4–7 points
    - Concepts and applications across STEAM disciplines are clearly demonstrated; strong alignment | 8–10 points
  • 4. Interactivity and Engagement
    10%
    Consider whether the campus design and layout foster student interaction and engagement—such as the inclusion of interactive displays, experimental zones, or spaces for student-participatory activities.
    - Lacks interactive design; low student engagement | 0–3 points
    - Includes some interactive design elements, but engagement remains limited | 4–7 points
    - Highly fosters student interaction; design incorporates diverse participatory activities | 8–10 points
  • 5. Safety and Sustainability
    10%
    Evaluate the safety and sustainability of the campus design and layout, including whether the materials used meet safety standards and whether factors such as energy efficiency and environmental protection have been considered.
    - Safety is inadequate; materials used do not meet standards | 0–3 points
    - Safety and sustainability considerations are average; some environmental measures are included | 4–7 points
    - Safety and sustainability are comprehensively considered; eco-friendly materials are used, and all standards are met | 8–10 points
  • 6. Spatial Planning and Design
    10%
    Consider the spatial planning and layout of the campus design, including the rationality of the environmental planning, the clarity of zoning, and whether the needs of students and teachers have been taken into account.
    - Disorganized spatial planning; user needs not considered | 0–3 points
    - Moderate consideration of safety and sustainability; some environmental protection measures included | 4–7 points
    - Clear and rational spatial planning; fully considers the needs of students and teachers | 8–10 points
  • 7. Visibility and Display Effect
    10%
    Evaluate the visibility and presentation effectiveness of the campus design and layout, including its ability to capture attention, spark student interest in STEAM, and showcase student work.
    - Lacks appeal; poor presentation | 0–3 points
    - Reasonably visible, but fails to generate strong interest | 4–7 points
    - Highly engaging design; effectively showcases student work | 8–10 points
  • 8. Maintainability and Updatability
    10%
    Consider the maintainability and adaptability of the campus design and layout, including the ease of cleaning, repair, and updating.
    - Difficult to maintain; the updating process is cumbersome | 0–3 points
    - Maintenance and updating are relatively easy, though there is still room for improvement | 4–7 points
    - Design facilitates easy maintenance and updating, ensuring the facility remains in good condition | 8–10 points
  • 9. Community Engagement and Collaboration
    10%
    - Failed to foster community engagement | 0–3 points
    - Some community collaboration, but limited impact | 4–7 points
    - Successfully encouraged community engagement and enhanced the impact of the campus design | 8–10 points
  • 10. Technology Integration and Application
    10%
    - Lack of technology application and integration | 0–3 points
    - Some application of technology, but with limited impact | 4–7 points
    - Effective integration of technology, enhancing the design's functionality and interactivity | 8–10 points

Total score: 100 points (maximum)

Grading Criteria:

0–40: Needs improvement
41–70: Satisfactory
71–90: Excellent
91–100: Outstanding

The purpose of these assessment criteria is to comprehensively consider various aspects of campus renovation and layout in order to evaluate their contribution to and impact on the STEAM educational environment. Specific criteria may vary by school; you may contact the secretariat for details to obtain more accurate information.

Target

Schools in Hong Kong & Macau

Awards

  • Champion: Certificate & trophy
  • Runner-up: Certificate & trophy
  • Second Runner-up: Certificate & trophy
  • Merit Award (3–5 recipients): Certificate

Registration & Administrative Fees

( No refunds will be possible )

  • Original Fee
    HK$250
  • Early Bird Fee
    HK$180

(Apply by December 31, 2026)

Registration Date

Aug 1, 2026

Deadline for Uploading Videos & Files

Apr 30, 2027

Please confirm the information by April 30, 2027;
no changes will be made after that.

Review Period

May 1 to June 30, 2027

Result Announcement

Before August 30, 2027

Download Leaflet
Judging Panel
Nominate Now

For enquiries, please contact the Secretariat via email info@aicehk.org or whatsapp (852) 6706 7168.

Organizer :
Co-organizer :

Macao Science Centre Website

Both parties have established professional expertise and a position of excellence and leadership in the field of educational innovation, which in turn has driven the development of artificial intelligence and STEAM education.

Golden Apple Award 2027:
Competition Rules and Disclaimer

Competition Rules

（I）Eligibility Requirements
  1. Participation is open to students, teachers, school supervisors, principals, and staff or heads of organizations based in Hong Kong or Macau.
  2. Individuals who participated in the previous edition without winning an award may register again; however, the submitted entry must be entirely different from the previous one—resubmission of past entries is not permitted.
  3. Each entrant (individual, school, or organization) may submit only one entry or project; multiple registrations are not accepted, and the same entry or project cannot be submitted for multiple award categories.
  4. Restriction for the “Outstanding Creative Education Leader Award”: A single school may nominate only one leader (supervisor or principal) to participate.
(II) Submission Rules
  1. All entries must be the original work of the participants; plagiarism or the misappropriation of others’ work is strictly prohibited. Entries must not infringe upon the legal rights of third parties—such as copyright or portrait rights—and must comply with the relevant provisions of Hong Kong’s Copyright Ordinance (Cap. 528). The entrant bears full liability for any infringement.
  2. Entry materials (videos, documents, etc.) must be finalized before the specified deadline and submitted via a Google Drive link sent to the designated email address: awards@aicehk.org. Late submissions, incomplete materials, or entries not meeting formatting requirements will not be accepted. (The link must be accessible and permissions granted.)
  3. Once submitted, entries cannot be modified or resubmitted. If a submitted file cannot be opened, the entry will be deemed withdrawn; alternatively, the entrant may choose to pay an administrative fee of HK$200 to resubmit the file.
  4. By submitting materials, participants grant the organizer permission to reproduce, publicly exhibit, and publish the entries online and in media—without further authorization or royalty payments—for event promotion and STEAM education demonstration purposes.
  5. Submitted files will not be returned; participants are responsible for retaining their own complete backups.
(III) Method of announcing the list of participants
  1. The competition results will be announced on August 30, 2027. Results will be published on the organization’s website and Facebook page, and winning individuals or organizations will be notified via email regarding award collection arrangements.
  2. Winning teachers or organizations may be invited to participate in media interviews (if applicable) or to showcase and present their winning lesson plans on the organization’s other platforms and/or at its events.
  3. The organizer and co-organizer will jointly produce a digital commemorative publication featuring all winning organizations and individuals; this will be uploaded to the official websites or media channels of the organizer and co-organizer for public viewing and commemoration. The organizer retains ownership of the digital publication’s content, design, and copyright.
(IV) Authorization for Personal Data and Publicity
  1. By registering, participants authorize the organizer to collect, process, and use the personal, school, or institutional information provided during registration for the purposes of competition-related communication, event promotion, and educational demonstrations.
  2. Participants agree to the public disclosure of their names, the names of their affiliated schools or institutions, and details regarding their entries via the organizer’s official channels. Following the announcement of results, winners are required to submit a recent (taken within the last three months) half-body JPG photograph (under 10MB), a logo file of their institution or school, and a winner’s statement of at least 150 words; the organizer may use these materials and the winning videos for purposes of academic exchange and recognition, both online and offline.
  3. Copyright for any photography or videography from the online or in-person award ceremony (if applicable) belongs to the organizer, the Asia Creative Education Association, and the co-organizer, the Macau Science Center; the organizers reserve the right to use this content indefinitely for long-term promotion and educational outreach.
(V) Authority for Event Management
  1. The results of the judging will serve as the final basis for the award rankings; no appeals process is available.
  2. The organizers reserve the right of final decision regarding the competition and may adjust any related arrangements—including competition rules, award categories, the event schedule, and the award presentation format—at any time without prior notice to participants.

Disclaimer

  1. The registration fee paid by participants covers administrative costs and is non-refundable under any circumstances.
  2. By completing the registration process, participants acknowledge that they have fully read, understood, and voluntarily agreed to all terms and conditions outlined in these “Competition Rules” and the “Disclaimer,” and accept all regulations without objection.
  3. The organizers shall not be held liable—nor are they required to notify individual participants—for issues such as damage, loss, incomplete content, poor image quality, mail delays, or delivery failures regarding entry materials, provided such issues do not result from the organizers’ own negligence. Participants are responsible for ensuring that their submitted files are complete, meet all specifications, and are submitted on time.
  4. Participants authorize the organizers to use—without limitation—all submitted materials (including school names, school emblems, participants’ likenesses, images, videos, and software entries) for the purpose of promoting the competition across all online and offline media; participants may not raise objections to such usage.
  5. All award rankings and scoring results are determined solely and independently by the judging panel; these decisions are final, and no appeals, challenges, or requests for review will be accepted.
  6. Entrants bear sole responsibility for the originality and copyright status of their submitted works and projects. Any proven instances of plagiarism, infringement, or other violations will result in immediate disqualification and the forfeiture of any awards; the entrant assumes full liability for any resulting civil or legal consequences, and the organizers bear no joint or several liability.
  7. Submitted materials—including documents and videos—will not be returned; entrants are advised to retain their own copies.
  8. The Asia Creative Education Association, the Macao Science Center, and the judging panel jointly hold the right of final interpretation regarding all rules and terms of this competition; the organizers reserve the right to make the final decision on any disputes arising from the event.